We provide here corrected numerical values for Figs. 5, 6, 7, 9(b), and 11 in our article [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 743 (2013) [CrossRef]  ].

© 2014 Optical Society of America

Full Article  |  PDF Article


  • View by:
  • |
  • |
  • |

  1. T. Cheng, C. Rangan, and J. E. Sipe, “Metallic nanoparticles on waveguide structures: effects on waveguide mode properties and the promise of sensing applications,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 30, 743–765 (2013).

2013 (1)

Cited By

OSA participates in Crossref's Cited-By Linking service. Citing articles from OSA journals and other participating publishers are listed here.

Alert me when this article is cited.

Figures (2)

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Peak wavelengths of the absorption curve as a function of cladding relative permittivity. The dotted curve represents a single particle, whereas the solid curve shows the NP-coated WG. The WG properties are as specified in Fig. 6 of the original publication, and the NP array parameters are given in the legend.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. (b) Sensitivity factor H for a bulk index NP-waveguide sensor, as described in the original text. We take a = 30 nm , b = h = 10 nm . The cladding’s relative permittivity changes from 1.0 to 1.5 in increments of 0.1.